Is history... history?
T he old adage always says "the victor writes the history". I am coming to question the universality of this statement. It seems to me sometimes the historical account pushed into record recounts in great details all the atrocities committed by the victor, while simultaneously washing the vanquished in guiltless attire: Their atrocities never to be remembered in common society, especially not in polite society. Any public evidence of such destroyed or removed to the fullest extent possible, and where impossible to erase: Ignored, defaced, and buried. ... And because now some are trying to ascribe some devilish horrible vision of myself, I assure you I speak not of any specific person or people. The concept stands for itself. Very few societies are guilt-free. I just find it interesting that as time goes by I find more historic reminders that no conflict is one-sided, more often than not, both sides were wrong, and most astonishingly there are those who many, many life